Today's
Feature
Disposal
Contract Changes Proposed.
The Public Works
committee discussed possible waste disposal
contract changes with Allied Waste representative
Jennifer Fagan on Tuesday afternoon. Fagan was
present at the committee meeting to renegotiate
the contract which isnt due to expire until
2009.
Proposed changes
include; the elimination of the citywide cleanup
in exchange for the pickup of one large household
item per week, the elimination of yard waste
pickup, combining the two currently offered
residential services to one package for $8.00 per
month, and condensing commercial hand-pick
services from five categories to one with an
increase to commercial rates in the amount of
14%.
The committee
discussed at some length each of these items. The
changes were requested by Allied Waste primarily
due to fuel cost increases. The committee focused
mainly on the cost increases to residential
pickup and requested that a senior rate be added
in the amount of $6.50. Fagan said she felt the
company would have no problem with this addition.
Committee member
Claude Newport asked if the City was obligated to
renegotiate the contract. Fagan said the City was
not obligated, but added that the changes were
proposed so that the company would not lose
money. Fagan added that eight other cities using
Allied Waste for disposal services had approved
similar changes so far.
Committee chair
Tom Flanigan asked if the $8.00 price would be
negotiable. Fagan replied that according to 20
pages worth of calculations $8 was the lowest
cost for company to not lose money. Fagan added
that the cost would still be lower than most
cities.
"This is
going to be a big one to sell to the citizens of
Carthage," said Flanigan of the increase.
Committee member
Bill Johnson questioned the increases and
requested information about increases in other
cities. Johnson said that he felt the increase
would hurt the citizens of Carthage.
"This will
hit the people that dont have a lot of
surplus funds," said Johnson.
The committee took
no action on the proposal. Flanigan said that
further research would be required, and requested
a special meeting to discuss the proposal
further.
"There is a
lot to consider," said Flanigan.
The committee
directed Tom Short to get information from
Carthage Water and Electric Plant concerning the
number of commercial contracts and different
plans currently in use in the City.
Allied Waste has
asked that the proposed changes take place on
October 1, when scheduled annual increases would
normally take effect under the current contract.
The committee expressed concerns about the amount
of work that would need to be done between now
and then to make that possible. It was agreed
that November would be a more plausible time
frame to initiate any changes that are made to
the contract. Billing for the collection service
is handled through Carthage Water and Electric
Plant and changes would need to be made in that
system as well as time needed for discussion and
hearings for the amendment.
Under the current
contract there are two categories for residential
pickup: Single person which costs $4.13 and
Family pickup which costs $6.52. There are 12
listed prices for commercial pickup whose prices
range from $7.21 to $86.52.
In addition to
fuel cost increases, reasons for the proposed
changes include; Yard waste not being accepted in
Missouri landfills, difficulty monitoring whether
single rate is used for one person, difficulty
enforcing policies for commercial pickup,
increased landfill costs, and increased costs for
truck repair and metal.
Carthage,
reportedly, has the lowest pricing in the area.
If the proposed changes are approved, Fagan says
that Carthages rate would still be lower
than most cities.
The special
meeting to further discuss changes is scheduled
for Thursday, September 14th at 7:00 p.m. in City
Hall.
Dog Park
Evaluation Continues.
The Public
Services Committee met Tuesday evening. The
committee discussed briefly the citizen initiated
proposal for a dog park in the City. The park
would allow dog owners to let their dogs run
without leashes in a fenced area for exercise
purposes.
At the previous
meeting citizens made a formal request for use of
any City property as a dog park. The group of
citizens said they would be willing to seek grant
funding for fences and equipment for the park and
make sure that the area is clean. The citizens
also requested water access. At that meeting the
committee requested that the group start a
petition process to gather information about
public interest.
At Tuesdays
meeting Parks Director Alan Bull brought
information from the parks department at
Lees Summit, which has a functional dog
park on City property. Bull said that Lees
Summit parks department funds the project and
provides maintenance.
According to the
parks director at Lees Summit the city does
not have any special insurance to cover dog
fights or dogs biting people. Committee member
Dan Rife said he was concerned about City
liability in a dog park and would still like to
see more information about it.
Bull added that
there is no separation between large and small
dogs at the Lees Summit facility.
City Administrator
Tom Short expressed concerns about grant
competition between this project and the proposed
skate park, which is also seeking grant funding.
Committee member
Bill Welch said he felt the project cost would be
low, as fencing is all that would be required.
Short replied that privacy fencing might be
required, adding that it could incur much greater
cost than chain-link fencing.
The citizens who
requested the park were not in attendance of the
meeting. Committee chair Claude Newport asked
Welch to encourage the citizens to return. The
committee took no action on the park.
|