Today's Feature Contract Will Allow City A Choice on
Recycling.
Members of the Public Works
Committee voted to recommend to the full Council
that the City retain the present trash hauling
contract including curbside recycling as voted on
last fall by the Council. The vote was three to
one with H. J. Johnson voting against the motion.
Committee members Bill Fortune, Trisha
Burgi-Brewer, and Charlie Bastin voted for.
The five year contract entered
into last year calls for curbside recycling to
begin this October. Fees for the recycling
program, starting at $1.29 for a family and $1.49
for a single person per month, would be
mandatory, participation in the program would
not. The City currently provides a free recycling
drop off station at the old City landfill.
Discussion began with City
Administrator Tom Short summarizing a letter from
American Disposal Services sent at the request of
Mayor Ken Johnson and the Council. The Mayor and
a few City Council members who oppose charging a
mandatory recycling fee had asked for information
from American regarding the Citys contract
and the ability to delay the start of curbside
recycling.
"The options are pretty
much open for us," said Short.
"Whatever we decide to do, they can do. The
only caveat is that if we decide to start the
curbside program, and they purchase the equipment
then well have those rates from here on out
whether we decide to stop the recycling program
or not."
Short explained that if the
City decided against beginning curbside recycling
this fall, American would honor rates quoted last
year during the bid process for trash-only
pickup.
In discussion with Committee
Chair Bill Fortune, Lowell Berliew of American
explained that if he had already purchased the
necessary equipment in anticipation of starting
curbside recycling in Carthage this fall and the
City then decided not to implement it, he does
believe the current contract would entitle him to
the recycling rates specified.
Berliew said he does not
believe the contract needs to be renegotiated and
emphasized that the rates really depend on
whether the company purchases the additional
equipment for recycling. American and the City
may mutually agree not to implement curbside
recycling. If the City goes ahead with curbside
recycling, American needs a decision within the
next two weeks in order to have the equipment
available for an October 1 start date.
With those options explained,
discussion centered between Committee Members
Trisha Burgi-Brewer and Johnson. Johnson was not
on the Council last fall when they voted on
recycling.
"I dont have
anything against recycling," said Johnson.
"You seem to," said
Burgi-Brewer.
"No, I dont,"
said Johnson. "I have trouble with me paying
so you dont have to go to the landfill
(recycling center)."
"Well, I dont like
to pay for a golf course, I dont like to
pay for a Victorian bus, I dont like to pay
for that water tower sign that nobody can see or
irrigated flower boxes, but I am," said
Burgi-Brewer. "This $12 or $15 per year is
negligible compared to some other things that we
seem to throw our money around on."
"Youre not throwing
your money around, youre throwing someone
elses money around," said Johnson.
"If you want the City to pay for it, we can
talk about that."
Johnson was referring to the
fact that households are billed for the service
rather than the City paying for it with tax
dollars.
"Were staring at
about $6000 a month that curbside recycling is
going to cost the residents of Carthage or
$72,000 a year," said Burgi-Brewer.
"Im sorry folks, but we spend a lot
less time on a lot more expensive projects than
we have quibbling about $72,000 a year."
"Were committing
$72,000 for the next four years, to me its
imposing that on people," said Johnson.
"For us to step outside our governmental
role and impose a service that has nothing to do
with the health and welfare of the community, for
us to force that on people, is not our role. If
we want to take it on as a community, as the City
government, and pay for that extra service then
we can deal with it and how to raise the money
for it. To just impose a quarter of a million
dollars of payments on people without any
recourse except to do it I think is not the right
way to approach it."
"First, I think it does
apply to the health and welfare of the
City," said Fortune. "It may not be as
obvious as other things, and secondly, we imposed
upon them the original contract, they didnt
have a choice not to participate. What if they
dont want their trash picked up?"
"There is a reason to take
trash out of this community," responded
Johnson. "There is not a reason for a clean,
labelless plastic bottle not to sit in
someones house. There is a reason for a
sack of garbage not to sit in their house."
"H.J. we could impose this
through our tax system, but we have chosen to
pursue it through Carthage Water and Electric
billing," said Burgi-Brewer. "It could
be handled in a lot of different ways. Whether
its a coming through CW&EP for a
service or whether it comes out of your personal
property taxes or sales taxes, its
ultimately out of your pocket. Which pocket it
comes out of really doesnt matter,
its the same thing."
|